Position Control of Mobile Robots for Laser Material Processing

Features

  • The aim of this paper is to investigate and to compare different position control algorithms that have been designed for and implemented in a mobile robot

  • Four different position control algorithms are compared with each other
    • P controller

    • PI controller

    • PID controller

    • Lyapunov controller

  • These are analyzed on three different paths
    • Circular Path

    • Eight-shaped Path

    • Rectangular Path

Results

  • The results are shown for each of the thee different paths

Circular Path

_images/Kreis_evaluated2.png

Results Circular Path

Summary of important numerical values of controller test on circular trajectory

Results Circular Path

metric

P controller

PI controller

PID controller

Lyapunov controller

mean absolute error in mm

1.45

1.76

0.997

1.196

median absolute error in mm

1.443

1.558

0.908

1.032

share of points above 2 mm target in %

27.866

34.076

9.554

13.535

minimal error in mm

0.029

0.045

0.014

0.012

maximal error in mm

4.19

8.284

4.734

6.43

Eight-shaped Path

_images/Infinity_evaluated2.png

Results Eight-shaped Path

Summary of important numerical values of controller test on eight-shaped trajectory

Results Eight-shaped Path

metric

P controller

PI controller

PID controller

Lyapunov controller

mean absolute error in mm

2.101

2.791

3.445

3.175

median absolute error in mm

1.966

2.116

2.648

2.306

share of points above 2 mm target in %

49.535

53.753

64.618

58.756

minimal error in mm

0.029

0.014

0.035

0

maximal error in mm

7.237

42.218

39.812

13.155

Rectangular Path

_images/Square_evaluated2.png

Results Square Path

Summary of important numerical values of controller test on square trajectory

Results Square Path

metric

P controller

PI controller

PID controller

Lyapunov controller

mean absolute error in mm

1.588

1.314

1.781

1.095

median absolute error in mm

1.311

1.172

1.604

0.971

share of points above 2 mm target in %

23.81

13.874

39.348

9.774

minimal error in mm

0.02

0.018

0

0.04

maximal error in mm

14.78

11.321

11.077

8.237

Acknowledgements

  • Funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germanys Excellence Strategy – EXC-2023 Internet of Production – 390621612

  • The authors acknowledge the financial support by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany in the framework of Research Campus Digital Photonic Production (project number: 13N15423)

  • The authors would like to thank Prof. Jeremy Witzens and Dr. Florian Merget from the Institute and Chair of Integrated Photonics at RWTH Aachen University for their support.

_images/IoP_Logo.png _images/Logo_Composing_DPP_BMBF_en.png

References

Contents

Indices and tables